Has anyone heard of NAET for treating allergies? Good or bad? Pam
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, April 30th, 2003 at 4:56 am and is filed under tips.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I noticed tha Jacqueline celebrated some positive results with NAET.
Up here in Winnipeg, a local herbologist was sharing his latest venture with us,
and, if I am not mistaken it was NAET. We are wondering whether to try this
service at some point. Apparently, it tests the functioning of systems, organs,
etc.
Could you elaborate on the process that worked so well for your son (I believe
it was), Jacqueline?
Thanks.
Frances
Sure Frances! It’s quite fascinating. As it’s quite involved, though, I am
explain it in probably the most uneducated way possible and how I understand
it.
It works on the principle of the meridians and I think it also goes by your
electrical processes aura (for want of a better word). (Everything and
everyone has an electrical charge either negative or positive - right down
to the tiniest atom.)
You’re first tested for allergies, normally in one batch of things at a
time. The allergies can be everything from milk to microwaves.
Once the practitioner has established some allergies/allergy she/he goes on
to “treat” that allergy. This part I don’t know exactly what is done as I
had to go out of the room, (as my electrical charge could effect the
treatment) but it is simular to dealing with pressure points, while the
patient holds a vial of what they are allergic to (or having same electrical
charge as).
The practitioner goes out of the room and the patient has to remain there
for 20 minutes or so.
The patient cannot touch, smell, eat etc that “thing” for 25 hours.
For example. When my son was treated for chicken, he had to stay completely
away from chicken, eggs, etc and wasn’t to sleep with a feather pillow or
doona that night.
I know of someone who had very bad rashes and they all disappeared within
the 25 hours! She was treated for microwaves, she had to stay away from
mobile phone, sun, TV, computer for 25 hours - boy that one would be hard!
Smiles,
JK
Thanks for the info on your child’s NAET experience.
Sounds like radical improvements can occur for some.
I wonder…
Thought the equipment and testing that we were shown sounds similar; but, I
wonder if it can be used differently, because the part I remember was where you
use the equipment to focus on the body/body systems/organs, in order to uncover
areas of difficulty… Perhaps, I will finally get down there one day and then
I can let you know what it was that he has been working with!
Frances
June 24th, 2005 at 11:31 am
I noticed tha Jacqueline celebrated some positive results with NAET.
Up here in Winnipeg, a local herbologist was sharing his latest venture with us,
and, if I am not mistaken it was NAET. We are wondering whether to try this
service at some point. Apparently, it tests the functioning of systems, organs,
etc.
Could you elaborate on the process that worked so well for your son (I believe
it was), Jacqueline?
Thanks.
Frances
June 24th, 2005 at 9:32 pm
Sure Frances! It’s quite fascinating. As it’s quite involved, though, I am
explain it in probably the most uneducated way possible and how I understand
it.
It works on the principle of the meridians and I think it also goes by your
electrical processes aura (for want of a better word). (Everything and
everyone has an electrical charge either negative or positive - right down
to the tiniest atom.)
You’re first tested for allergies, normally in one batch of things at a
time. The allergies can be everything from milk to microwaves.
Once the practitioner has established some allergies/allergy she/he goes on
to “treat” that allergy. This part I don’t know exactly what is done as I
had to go out of the room, (as my electrical charge could effect the
treatment) but it is simular to dealing with pressure points, while the
patient holds a vial of what they are allergic to (or having same electrical
charge as).
The practitioner goes out of the room and the patient has to remain there
for 20 minutes or so.
The patient cannot touch, smell, eat etc that “thing” for 25 hours.
For example. When my son was treated for chicken, he had to stay completely
away from chicken, eggs, etc and wasn’t to sleep with a feather pillow or
doona that night.
I know of someone who had very bad rashes and they all disappeared within
the 25 hours! She was treated for microwaves, she had to stay away from
mobile phone, sun, TV, computer for 25 hours - boy that one would be hard!
Smiles,
JK
June 27th, 2005 at 9:52 pm
Thanks for the info on your child’s NAET experience.
Sounds like radical improvements can occur for some.
I wonder…
Thought the equipment and testing that we were shown sounds similar; but, I
wonder if it can be used differently, because the part I remember was where you
use the equipment to focus on the body/body systems/organs, in order to uncover
areas of difficulty… Perhaps, I will finally get down there one day and then
I can let you know what it was that he has been working with!
Frances